Dungeons & Dragons Online: Stormreach

These are big projects! I mean, MMOs are still a pretty new art. And games are really improved by iteration - by making something, examining it, polishing it, making it again, cutting away the parts that don't work, adding parts that do... It takes a lot of time.

Well, I can't judge whether they were infringing on intellectual property rights. Speaking privately: Were they? Maybe, even probably... But, you know, there's a long history of fantasy role-playing games. D&D has been the mainstay of those for 30 years now, and there have been legends and stories and hobbits and elves for a very long time, no one's going to stop those kinds of games from getting created.

But there are specific elements in D&D Online, such as the Beholder, for example, which is a trademarked D&D monster. We're the first and only MMO to have a creature like that, and there are plenty of other examples.

Obviously, the biggest difference is that we use the D&D rules and the D&D system. Any fantasy game could let you play as a fighter or a wizard, but there are tens of millions of D&D fans out there, and when they load up this game, they don't need to learn the rules - they know them already. That's a big advantage for us.

It's one of three. The first difference is the D&D IP - we're making the D&D game, not something like it.

The second one is the action-based combat, the blocking and dodging and rolling. Obviously your character's ability matters in terms of how strong they are, what level they are and so on, but another big part of it is your own player skill - how good you are at seeing what monsters are doing, using the right spell, blocking against nasty attacks et cetera.

We're really the first kind of game to introduce some elements of tactical control. In a lot of MMOs, you just push the auto-attack button and you don't need to worry about anything else. Maybe you have a special kick or a taunt to push every once in a while, but that's pretty much the limit of the sophistication for the fighting class. We wanted that to be much more interesting, that was our big design goal.

The last point is our quest and story-based system. We don't give XP per kill, and we don't give treasure on random monsters - which encourages players to find alternative solutions to problems, to sneak around, to solve puzzles, to just explore their world and take different paths to success.

I'll be perfectly honest: some people will say that. But not all games are made for all people. The great thing about the MMO business is that it's been growing so much... There's a lot of crossover now. Just about all of my friends who play MMOs also have an Xbox, and also have a PS2, and half of them have Xbox 360s now, and that crossover is pretty strong.

Yes, some people are going to want a very slow-paced combat system, but that's not what D&D's for. We have an auto-attack button so that if you're fighting a monster that's easy or you just need a second to type in something, you can use it, but the real precepts of our design are based on a more action-style game. We wanted combat to be more fun and thrilling, and that's how we accomplished it.

Part of it is just being loyal to the themes and to the spirit of the D&D system. Of course, we weren't going to be turn-based, since turn-based online games have proved remarkably unsuccessful; Civilization's first attempts at online play were more or less disastrous. Turn-based play doesn't essentially work, certainly not in groups larger than two, since waiting on someone else to make a turn is fundamentally un-fun unless you have something to do in the meanwhile.

So the next question becomes, how do we represent D&D's tactical combat? You know, we're not going to lay out a grid and make miniatures move around. We're already fast-paced by definition, and pushing that envelope and introducing new styles of gameplay is something people will support, I think.

No, the world is persistent, your character is persistent, everybody else's characters are persistent... There's definitely a sense that there's a world out there. But you're right in that it's not about going out and finding out what's behind that tree. I mean, you can do that, and it could be any number of things - a monster, a treasure chest - but the real goal for us was creating fun team-based gameplay, and that's what the game's about.

What players are really promised with a subscription based game, and certainly what they're promised with D&D Online, is frequent and agressive expansion plans. It's not just that the servers cost us money to run and customer service costs. Our first content push will happen only about 30 days after launch, and then we'll continue to add more stuff every couple of months afterwards. We want to support a very large design team continuing to aggressively add content to the game, so you never run out of stuff to do.

Some yes, some no. I think the first one will be a free patch, but eventually, on an annual or maybe semi-annual basis, we'd be talking about retail expansion packs, which will be bigger expansions.

There's so many hardcore players, people who say, "I've played D&D for 15 years and I would design it like this!" And with D&D, you can change the basic rules freely - in fact, the rules encourage you to do so. So unless this game is played as exactly as your game is being played at home, there's going to be a good percentage of people going, "I don't want to do this!"

The great thing is that fortunately for us, so many players have come in and gone, "This isn't the game I was expecting," "This is not a copy of World of Warcraft," or "This is not the exact D&D rules implementation that I wanted."

Fortunately, after a couple of weeks, most of them go: "But it's really fun." At first, many of our initial beta playtesters were like, "Whoa!" and then it's like, "Cool!", and that's the exact reaction we wanted.

And that's encouraging news for us. We can't grant everyone's wishes all the time. Of course we're going to have new expansions, more content, more classes and all those kinds of things. But players just have to bear with us, because there's 30 years of D&D to cover - we'll never get to it all!

In general, the responses to the game have been very positive. We're ecstatic about the pre-sales we're getting, everything is going really well.

A lot. We have to, because that's what the beta's for. So, for example, we gave the players who really, really wanted it an auto-attack key. It won't be as efficient as using those tactical movement buttons, but you can do it.

Similarly, we did some major revamps on melée speed, and we slowed it down a fair bit - that was necessary to let players have a bit more time to think as they fight, and to bring the spellcasting balance better in line. We made big adjustments to archery, so you can move while you're shooting... A lot of things like that. The beta audience has been really important to us.

Really high quality content. The quest objectives, the puzzles, the traps, different approaches to doing a quest, invisibility and stealth and all those kind of things... Single player games are full of that high level of quality content, but MMOs? Never before.

It's been a real honour to work on this project. I've been working on it for three years, and I'm both very sad to see it ship because there's always new things I want to add, and also very happy, because I want new people to be able to play it other than just me and my team of designers.